![]() ![]() ![]() Reject: Poker players play professionally. If both tables take the same amount then it doesn’t matter much which table is placed there. Roulette tables are not popular then replacing roulette tables is better as it can bring more revenue. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument that Notorious’s decision will have its desired effect?Ĭonclusion: to increase its total profit: recently replaced its roulette tables with the same number of poker tables.įind reasoning why? - > Replacing Roulette will not bring profit Need to be more attentive whenever I see "average".įollowing an analysis showing that the average poker player spends more money than the average roulette player, and as part of an effort to increase its total profit, Notorious, Kingland’s finest casino, recently replaced its roulette tables with the same number of poker tables. GMAT actually enjoys this kind of question. (D) Jackpot! The total revenue from roulette table can actually be higher than that from poker game. It does not directly address the decision. (C) Maybe professional players spend more money per person? Even so, it only explains the disparity in their betting habits. Because I have yet seen (D), I can eliminate (B) without thinking too much into it. Making such connection, though, requires more intimate knowledge about casino games. Certainly, in view of (D), it might weaken the argument. (B) It is either neutral, or it strengths the argument. playing roulette (or simply the sound emitted by the playing of roulette) has psychological effect on poker players to bet more money. poker players also enjoy roulette, without which they will go to other, less fine, casinos.Ģ. Pre-thinking (I failed to anticipate answer (D) partly because I have never played roulette. That means that now casino’s expenses are lower than before. The casino’s cost per person at a roulette table is higher than its cost per person at a poker table. 20 people participate in a game of roulette and 5 people participate in a game of poker.Į. This may simply means poker players attend more regularly since they are professional. Poker players are much more likely to be professional poker players than roulette players are likely to be professional roulette players. This means that there was no additional construction to open up the space. Both tables take up the same amount of space in the casino. This choice actually strengthens the casino’s planī. The roulette tables are far less popular than the poker tables. the only choice that addresses this issue is D.Ī. If in average a poker player spends $100 while a roulette player $95, but if the number of the latter is twice more, than ditching roulette players means a $90 loss not a gain. Then we can show that either there are fewer players of poker, reducing the total revenue, or there is more cost in poker, reducing the profit.īriefly skimming through our answers, we find that (D) is the only answer that does one of these: it states that fewer people participate in each game of poker. So we want to weaken the argument that Notorious made a good decision, meaning we want to show that there will be a decrease in profit. The second equation tells us that to connect the average amount spent by the poker player to the total revenue, we need to know the number of players. The first equation tells us that increasing the profit requires increasing the revenue or decreasing the costs. cost and on that of averages, specifically, that profit = revenue – cost and that the total revenue = average revenue × number of customers. The argument relies on the logic of profit vs. We’ll go for LOGICAL because there is a hidden equation behind the scenes. Win over $40,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more This question was provided by The Economist
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |